* Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > here is an update for Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt. > Respect to the RFC I sent few days ago, I: > 1) Split the patches in a better way, (so that, for example, Zhiqiang Zhang's > authorship is preserved) > 2) Tried to address all the comments I received on the RFC > 3) Added another patch, to split Section 3 in various subsections. > I think it is more readable in this way. Anyway, this is the last patch, > so it can easily be skipped if people do not like it. > > I also split in a separate patch the discussion about the relationship between > tasks' parameters and SCHED_DEADLINE parameters. This is (I think) the only > part of the patchset that has not been previously discussed; I decided to > isolate it in its own patch so that other patches can be applied anyway. Note that your Signed-off-by lines are missing. I also noticed the following inconsistency: 'utilization' (and variants) is spelled in two variants in the text: 'utilization' and 'utilisation'. I'd strongly suggest using 'utilization' et al (american spelling), because that's how it's spelled in most of the kernel source. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
