On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 14:18 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:13:03 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add format specifiers for printing struct clk: > > - '%pC' or '%pCn': name (Common Clock Framework) or address (legacy > > clock framework) of the clock, > > - '%pCr': rate of the clock. [] > Seems a bit cruel to teeny systems which don't implement clock. How does > this look? Saves 160 bytes in each powerpc build! Does this still emit a pointer value for those systems? Glancing at it, does it just emit NULL? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
