On 02/26/15 03:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > Hi, > > This patch series improves the documentation for printk() formats, and > adds support for printing clocks. The latter has always been a hassle if > you wanted to support both the common and legacy clock frameworks. Would the hassle go away if everyone moved to the common framework? I'm mostly trying to understand the justification. Also, I wonder why we wouldn't want to add formats for all the other handle based frameworks that we have nowdays (gpio, regulator, pinctrl, etc.). -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
