Hi Maxime,
Am Donnerstag, den 12.02.2015, 18:46 +0100 schrieb Maxime Coquelin:
[...]
> + soc {
> + reset_ahb1: reset@40023810 {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> + reg = <0x40023810 0x4>;
> + };
> +
> + reset_ahb2: reset@40023814 {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> + reg = <0x40023814 0x4>;
> + };
> +
> + reset_ahb3: reset@40023818 {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> + reg = <0x40023818 0x4>;
> + };
> +
> + reset_apb1: reset@40023820 {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> + reg = <0x40023820 0x4>;
> + };
> +
> + reset_apb2: reset@40023824 {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> + reg = <0x40023824 0x4>;
> + };
These are mostly consecutive, single registers. I wonder if these are
part of the same IP block and thus should be grouped together into the
same reset controller node?
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
