Re: [PATCH] of: Custom printk format specifier for device node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pantelis Antoniou <panto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Joe,
>
>> On Jan 21, 2015, at 19:37 , Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 19:06 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> 90% of the usage of device node's full_name is printing it out
>>> in a kernel message. Preparing for the eventual delayed allocation
>>> introduce a custom printk format specifier that is both more
>>> compact and more pleasant to the eye.
>>> 
>>> For instance typical use is:
>>> 	pr_info("Frobbing node %s\n", node->full_name);
>>> 
>>> Which can be written now as:
>>> 	pr_info("Frobbing node %pO\n", node);
>> 
>> Still disliking use of %p0.
>> 
>
> Choices are limited. And it’s pO not p0.

O as in OF.  Makes sense.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mans@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux