On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 02:55:53PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > The current organization of Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt > doesn't clearly differentiate the mutually exclusive options for > submission to the -stable review process. As I understand it, patches > are not actually required to be mailed directly to > stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, but the instructions do not make this clear. > > Also, there are some established processes that are not listed -- > specifically, what I call Option 2 below. > > This patch updates and reorganizes a bit, to make things clearer. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: add some more items to Option 2 to suit Greg's liking > > Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) Looks good, I'll queue this up after 3.19-rc1 is out. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
