Hi Pavel and Bryan, On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:51:55PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2014-11-25 22:09:49, Bryan Wu wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri 2014-11-21 09:15:31, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > > >> Hi Pavel, > > >> > > >> On 11/20/2014 09:52 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > >> >On Thu 2014-11-20 15:48:26, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > > >> >>On 11/20/2014 02:38 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > > >> >>>Hi Pavel, > > >> >>> > > >> >>>On 11/20/2014 02:17 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>>Add attributes neccessary for LED flashes to > > >> >>>>devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt . > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>>This will allow me to add device tree support for adp1653 i2c flash > > >> >>>>LED driver, and allow Jacek Anaszewski to add support for more LED > > >> >>>>drivers.. > > >> >.. > > >> >> > > >> >>Actually, we've agreed with Sakari that we can handle > > >> >>indicator-pattern later. > > >> > > > >> >Good. > > >> > > > >> >>I would remove references to you, me and adp1653 driver from the commit > > >> >>message and mention that this modifications adjust the led common > > >> >>bindings to the LED Flash class that is to be added. > > >> > > > >> >Ok, who can take this patch? Can you edit the changelog, or should I > > >> >do it? Anything else that needs changing? > > >> > > >> It's your patch :) For me the contents of the patch are ok. > > >> It requires device tree maintainer approval anyway. > > > > > > Yeah, I was hoping relevant maintainers would speak up. I was not > > > asking you to edit the changelog, sorry I was unclear. > > > > > > Bryan Wu, Richard Purdie: You are the maintainers. Can you take the > > > patch? > > > > I'm OK for this patch, but since Jacek and Sakari are working on > > pushing LED Flash class and driver into our LED subsystem. I need you > > guys' Ack for this. Then I can take it in my tree. > > Jacek acked it (provided I modify changelog). > > I can't get Sakari to get explicit ACK, but he was cc-ed on the > discussion, and was ok with the idea. That should be enough...? My apologies for missing this one --- I've gotten too much mail lately. :-P Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> The flash timeout is really a very coarse way to avoid overheating the flash (controller or LED) but it's still what is often used in practice. This doesn't prevent strobing the flash right after the previous strobe has stopped, but is definitely better than nothing; this at least prevents accidental overheating of the components. -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
