Re: [PATCH] kbuild: update headers_install.txt document

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed,  3 Dec 2014 15:45:41 +0900
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The arch header directories "include/asm-*" were moved long ago.
> Now we should check the existence of arch/*/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild
> to see if an architecture supports the headers installation.
> (Actually, "um" is the only architecture that does not have it.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

So please forgive me if I seem overly difficult and fussy, but...  while
I'm all for fancy shell one-liners, wouldn't it be more straightforward,
in this case, to simply say in the documentation that all architectures
other than um have support?

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux