Hi Uwe, Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hello, > > finally I managed to test this series on my (unmodified) rn104. > > For patch 1: Maybe point out that the issue with the century bit isn't > that critical, because this bit is not expected to be set before year 2100. > > For patch 3: This patch adds a few dev_err calls that get later amended > in patch 5 to also include an error code. IMHO these should already be > added in patch 3. Patch 5 should only add it to the already existing > strings (if applicable). > > For patch 4: Maybe > s/obsolete/for backwards compatibility, don't use in new code/. > > Some further comments inline ... Thanks for the tests. I'll take a look at your comments this evening. Cheers, a+ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
