Hi, Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 11/26/2014 07:35 PM, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: >> I wonder if you could take a look at this series I sent providing fixes >> (patches #1-5) and alarm support (patch #6) for ISL12057 RTC Chip. As >> all people do for RTC patches - due to lack of feedback from maintainer >> - I am looking for someone to review the patches (Mark, patch 6 has a >> sticker w/ regmap-inside ;-)) and then push those upstream if they are >> ok (Jason, you handled that part for 70e123373c05: "rtc: Add support for >> Intersil ISL12057 I2C RTC chip" in 2013 for the same reason). >> >> Note that I addressed previous comments and feedback received from Uwe >> and also spent time to do some soldering in order to support and test >> the last patch for both my use case (Alarm IRQ signal not routed to the >> SoC on ReadyNAS RN102, RN104 and RN2120) and the common case. >> >> Do not hesitate to ask if you want me to resend! > akpm already applied the series, doesn't he? I am not really familiar w/ -mm tree workflow. It was not clear to me whether it was sitting in -mm tree waiting for reviewed-by and acked-by. > I'm about to test the patches, just fighting with my NAS to boot my > custom kernel. > > Apart from that patches 1 - 5 can have my Ack. Didn't look deep enough > into patch 6 yet. @akpm: No need to hurry adding them, I hope to be > able to also provide Tested-by:-tags later today. I'll be happy to handle comments and possible requests for additional changes if needed. Cheers, a+ ps: anyway, thanks Andrew! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
