On 11/05/14 16:15, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:08:15 +0200 > Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Boris, >> >> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:55:06AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: >>> The v4l2_mbus_pixelcode enum (or its values) should be replaced by the >>> media_bus_format enum. >>> Keep this enum in v4l2-mediabus.h and create a new header containing >>> the v4l2_mbus_framefmt struct definition (which is not deprecated) so >>> that we can add a #warning statement in v4l2-mediabus.h and hopefully >>> encourage users to move to the new definitions. >>> >>> Replace inclusion of v4l2-mediabus.h with v4l2-mbus.h in all common headers >>> and update the documentation Makefile to parse v4l2-mbus.h instead of >>> v4l2-mediabus.h. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/DocBook/media/Makefile | 2 +- >>> include/media/v4l2-mediabus.h | 2 +- >>> include/uapi/linux/Kbuild | 1 + >>> include/uapi/linux/v4l2-mbus.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> include/uapi/linux/v4l2-mediabus.h | 26 ++++---------------------- >> >> I would keep the original file name, even if the compatibility definitions >> are there. I don't see any harm in having them around as well. >> > > That's the part I was not sure about. > The goal of this patch (and the following ones) is to deprecate > v4l2_mbus_pixelcode enum and its values by adding a #warning when > v4l2-mediabus.h file is included, thus encouraging people to use new > definitions. Since v4l2-mediabus.h contains struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt this header remains a legal header, so you can't use #warning here in any case. Regards, Hans > > Do you see another solution to generate such warnings at compilation > time ? > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
