On pią, 2014-10-31 at 10:29 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 31 October 2014 10:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On pon, 2014-10-20 at 11:04 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> Add a simple getter pm_runtime_is_irq_safe() for querying whether runtime > >> PM IRQ safe was set or not. > >> > >> Various bus drivers implementing runtime PM may use choose to suspend > >> differently based on IRQ safeness status of child driver (e.g. do not > >> unprepare the clock if IRQ safe is not set). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Rafael, Len, Pavel, > > > > Is proposed API ok? Do you have any comments? > > > > I'll upload whole patchset to Russell's patch tracking system. However > > an ack from PM maintainer is probably needed. > > I would actually prefer the opposite. It's better if we can take these > patches through Rafaels tree. > > 1) I have posted patches for the amba bus, these may have merge > conflicts with your changes. > 2) We may start using the new runtime PM API within genpd as of now. I don't mind and it makes sense to me. This way I need an ack from Russell or Vinod... Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
