On 10/07/2014 06:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:48:17PM -0500,tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Add 2 SPI nodes to SOCFPGA device tree. Update copyright.
Update spi-dw.txt with bus-num as an optional property.
Again, this is just randomly mixing multiple changes. Also why are we
adding a bus-num property - bus numbers are an implementation detail of
Linux and I can't see any reason to put them in the device tree. If
there were one the binding would need to explain what they were.
OK. I will leave these changes out of the patch.
Sorry about the noise. I saw the spi-summary referenced the bus-num
spi<bus-num>.<chip-select> so I thought it could be added to the
bindings document. The bus was defaulting to 32766 if the bus wasn't
assigned from the device tree (spi32766.0).
Thanks,
Thor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
