Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] pci:host: APM X-Gene PCIe host controller driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>>> +static void xgene_pcie_fixup_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     int i;
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* Hide the PCI host BARs from the kernel as their content doesn't
>>>> +      * fit well in the resource management
>>>> +      */
>>>
>>> This needs a better explanation than "doesn't fit well."
>>>
>>> I *think* you're probably talking about something similar to the MVEBU
>>> devices mentioned here:
>>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAErSpo56jB1Bf2JtYCGKXZBZqRF1jXFxGmeewPX_e6vSXueGyA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> where the device can be configured as either an endpoint or a root port,
>>> and the endpoint BARs are still visible when configured as a root port.
>>>
>>
>> It is true that X-Gene PCIe port can be configured as EP, however the
>> the FIXUP is required not because of the BARs are still visible when
>> configured as EP in past. X-Gene PCIe port, when configured as RC,
>> uses BAR0-BAR1 of RC's configuration space as inbound BARs. Entire DDR
>> region is mapped in these BARs so that it is accessible for EP devices
>> for DMA. So if the fixup is not done during enumeration, whole
>> outbound memory resource space gets assigned to RC and nothing is left
>> EP devices.
>
> I'm not familiar with the concept of an "inbound BAR"; at least I'm
> not aware of anything like this in the PCI specs.  I think it might
> reduce confusion if we avoided calling them "BARs".  They happen to be
> at the same addresses where real BARs would be, but they certainly
> don't behave like real BARs.
>
> It sounds like this is basically a trivial IOMMU that determines which
> DMA accesses can reach main memory.
>

Yes. That is correct.

>>> In any event, I'd like a description of exactly what these BARs are and wha
>>> the problem is.
>>
>> Is it ok to put above description in comment to explain the fixup?
>>
>>> Presumably the BARs exist and were sized by the PCI core
>>> in __pci_read_base().  That will generate some log messages and possibly
>>> some warnings, depending on how the host bridge windows are set up.
>
> Instead of doing this in a fixup, can you change the PCI config
> accessors so that when accessing these inbound DMA mapping registers,
> they drop writes and return zeros for reads?  Then the PCI core won't
> think there are BARs there, and it won't mistakenly corrupt them when
> it tries to size them.
>

I suppose this can be done. I will fix this in next revision.

> Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux