Hi,
Some one has submitted a patch addressing this issue a few days ago.
The patch is now being cooked in the paulk's tree now, IIRC.
Thanks,
Jianyu Zhan
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Yao Dongdong <yaodongdong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The table shows CPU2's sequence of events as "x = B; y = A;", but its comment followed
> described as "x = A; y = B;".
>
> Signed-off-by: Yao Dongdong <yaodongdong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> index a4de88f..9a46bbe 100644
> --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> @@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ For example, consider the following sequence of events:
> CPU 1 CPU 2
> =============== ===============
> { A == 1; B == 2 }
> - A = 3; x = B;
> - B = 4; y = A;
> + A = 3; x = A;
> + B = 4; y = B;
>
> The set of accesses as seen by the memory system in the middle can be arranged
> in 24 different combinations:
> --
> 1.8.0.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
