On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 23:00 +0000, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) > wrote: >> > From: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-kernel- >> > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe Perches >> ... >> > +chang||change >> >> Although there are at least 2 misuses in the current kernel, >> that's also a fairly common name. > > True. Thanks. > > That one should likely be removed. > There are dozens of Chang name uses in the kernel. Right, I removed a bunch similar things like this. > I'm not attached at all to any of these btw. > > Any others you think should not be used or > should be added? > > One I thought kind of iffy was > > contant||contact > > Maybe that should be content instead. Or "constant". I'll go through the list and see if anything stands out. > Another thing the script might do is to check > if the $typo match is all upper case and then > substitute an all upper case $typo_fix. That might be a good idea. > It's also kind of noisy when run using -f, > so maybe this test should be --strict check with > files and a warning with patches. Sure, seems reasonable. I'll get a v2 spun up. -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
