Hi, On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Addy Ke <addy.ke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To support HS200 and UHS-1, we need add a big hunk of code, > as shown in the following patches. So a separate file for > rockchip SOCs is suitable. > > Signed-off-by: Addy Ke <addy.ke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v2: > - Kconfig: depend on ARCH_ROCKCHIP, suggested by Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > - Kconfig: depend on OF, suggested by Doug Anderson > - Not change suspend/resume code, suggested by Doug Anderson > - If pdev->dev.of_node is NULL, then return -ENODEV, suggested by Heiko Stübner > > drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 9 +++ > drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-pltfm.c | 57 ---------------- > drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig > index a565254..f6095f6 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig > @@ -621,6 +621,15 @@ config MMC_DW_PCI > > If unsure, say N. > > +config MMC_DW_ROCKCHIP > + tristate "Rockchip specific extensions for Synopsys DW Memory Card Interface" > + depends on MMC_DW && ARCH_ROCKCHIP && OF Actually, Heiko's change to check if pdev->dev.of_node is NULL means that you don't need to depend on OF anymore. Ulf: do you want Addy to spin again, or do you want to just remove this "&& OF" when applying the patch? ...I've tested this both with and without the "&& OF", and the "&& OF" won't really hurt anything, so: Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
