caesar,
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:23 PM, caesar <caesar.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 在 2014年08月07日 10:16, Doug Anderson 写道:
>
>> Caesar,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:27 PM, caesar <caesar.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Doug,
>>>
>>> 在 2014年08月07日 06:46, Doug Anderson 写道:
>>>
>>>> Caesar,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Caesar Wang
>>>> <caesar.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v1 = {
>>>>> + .regs.duty = PWM_HRC,
>>>>> + .regs.period = PWM_LRC,
>>>>> + .regs.cntr = PWM_CNTR,
>>>>> + .regs.ctrl = PWM_CTRL,
>>>>> + .prescaler = PRESCALER,
>>>>> + .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v1,
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v2 = {
>>>>> + .regs.duty = PWM_LRC,
>>>>> + .regs.period = PWM_HRC,
>>>>> + .regs.cntr = PWM_CNTR,
>>>>> + .regs.ctrl = PWM_CTRL,
>>>>> + .prescaler = PRESCALER-1,
>>>>> + .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2,
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_vop = {
>>>>> + .regs.duty = PWM_LRC,
>>>>> + .regs.period = PWM_HRC,
>>>>> + .regs.cntr = PWM_CTRL,
>>>>> + .regs.ctrl = PWM_CNTR,
>>>>
>>>> Did you really mean to flip CTRL and CNTR here? If so, that's super
>>>> confusing and deserves a comment. AKA, I think the above should not
>>>> be:
>>>>
>>>> + .regs.cntr = PWM_CTRL,
>>>> + .regs.ctrl = PWM_CNTR,
>>>>
>>>> ...but should be
>>>>
>>>> + .regs.cntr = PWM_CNTR,
>>>> + .regs.ctrl = PWM_CTRL,
>>>>
>>>> If you didn't mean to flip CTRL and CNTR here, then just get rid of
>>>> pwm_data_vop and refer to pwm_data_v2. In fact, I'd suggest that you
>>>> totally remove the "rockchip,vop-pwm" since there's nothing different
>>>> between "rockchip,rk3288-pwm" and "rockchip,vop-pwm".
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry,I think it's no problem. the "rockchip,rk3288-pwm" and
>>> "rockchip,vop-pwm" are seperate PWM controllers.
>>> They are just different registers address between CNTR and CTRL .
>>
>> OK, I looked up in the TRM. Right, the CNTR and CTRL are flipped on
>> the vop. So I think that the only change you need is to add:
>>
>> #define PWM_VOP_CTRL 0x00
>> #define PWM_VOP_CNTR 0x0c
>>
>> ...then use these new #defines for the vop structure.
>>
>>
>> As you have the code written right now it's very confusing. The new
>> #defines will fix this.
>>
> yeah, I think they can be used in the same context.
>
> I will fix it in patch v5 if it is really need.
I think you should fix this, but if Thierry doesn't think so then it's
really his decision.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
