Re: [PATCH v2 21/29] nios2: Futex operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2014 11:42:34 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Friday 18 July 2014 14:07:42 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > If this understanding is right, we can probably just merge the
>> > m68k implementation into the asm-generic version, as that does
>> > exactly that, and just isn't SMP safe. I'm still unsure whether
>> > I'm missing something here though, as everything else seems to
>> > do this in assembly, even for non-SMP machines that could use
>> > the trivial method that m68k has.
>>
>> For UP relying of pagefault disable should be good enough indeed. I
>> guess the asm for the other UP stuff results from looking at
>> architectures or copying from architectures which did this in ASM
>
> Ok, thanks for the confirmation!
>
> Ley Foon Tan, I think the best way forward then is for you to
> take the m68k code and copy (or move) that into asm-generic/futex.h
> under an #ifndef CONFIG_SMP.

Okay, I will copy m68k implementation to asm-generic/futex.h.
Do you prefer this as separate patch submission or this can be part of
nios2 patchset?
Thanks.

Regards
Ley Foon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux