Hi Daniel, Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2014, 11:46:51 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: > On 07/07/2014 05:13 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > This adds a generic devicetree board file and a dtsi for boards > > based on MT6589 SoCs from Mediatek. > > > > Apart from the generic parts (gic, clocks) the only component > > currently supported are the timers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx> > > -- > > I will take this patchset through my tree but this patch touches an area > I am not handling. > > Olof, Arnd, do you mind to ack this patch ? wouldn't it be easier to just take patches 1,2,3,4 through your tree and let patches 5,6,7 go through arm-soc? There is no compile-time dependency between the two parts, so they will come together nicely in linux-next and during the merge-window. Also in [0] Olof wrote: ---------- Traditionally we usually take the DT changes through arm-soc, but as long as we share the branch we might be ok. We tend to stick them in different branches in our tree though, so rockchip will be a little mis-sorted this release. Not a big deal, and we can deal with it. ----------- So I'd assume splitting the patchset this way might be a nice solution? Heiko [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg347053.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
