On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:59:57AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: > On 7/13/2014 6:14 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > >Suravee, > > > >On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:05:00PM -0500, suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx wrote: > >>From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> > >> > >>This patch set introduces support for MSI(-X) in GICv2m specification, > >>which is implemented in some variation of GIC400. > >> > >>This depends on and has been tested with the V7 of"Add support for PCI in AArch64" > >>(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/14/320). > > > >Grrr. I mis-spoke against your v1 of this series. There are more > >changes to irq-gic.c than I originally thought in this series. > > I am not quite sure what your are referring to. > No problem, it was an old comment. If you weren't depending on it then it doesn't matter. ;-) > >Additionally, we have a lot of other significant changes to that driver > >as well this cycle. It would be really helpful if I could take patches > >1-3 through irqchip/gic. I can Ack #4 with the Subject change, and the > >branch it lands in can depend on irqchip/gic, no problem there. > > Patch 1-3 should be able to go through the irqchip/gic along with > the gicv3 from Marc, which I have rebased this patch against. Perfect! > Patch 4 is arch64 architectural changes. Therefore, it might need > to be going through a different branch. Marc/Mark/Will/Catalin, do > you have any suggestions on which branch this should go to? Yep, I'll Ack it for arm64 to take, conflicts should be minimal. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
