On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/11/2014 08:14 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > > +static void mtk_clkevt_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
> > > + struct clock_event_device *clk)
> > > +{
> > > + struct mtk_clock_event_device *evt = to_mtk_clk(clk);
> > > +
> > > + mtk_clkevt_time_stop(evt, GPT_CLK_EVT);
> > > +
> > > + switch (mode) {
> > > + case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC:
> > > + mtk_clkevt_time_setup(evt, evt->ticks_per_jiffy, GPT_CLK_EVT);
> > > + mtk_clkevt_time_start(evt, true, GPT_CLK_EVT);
> > > + break;
> > > + case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT:
> > > + mtk_clkevt_time_start(evt, false, GPT_CLK_EVT);
> >
> > Why start the timer here? The code will call set next event right away.
> >
> > > + break;
> > > + case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED:
> > > + case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN:
> > > + default:
> > > + /* No more interrupts will occur as source is disabled */
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> >
> > Looks good otherwise.
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Can I consider the 8.1 patch (the one taking into account your comment) as
> acked-by ?
Yes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
