On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 02:12:17PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote: >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Steffen Trumtrar >> <s.trumtrar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:38:34AM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Steffen Trumtrar >> >> <s.trumtrar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > Hi! >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:31:06AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Thor Thayer <tthayer.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram.txt >> >> >> >>> >> new file mode 100644 >> >> >> >>> >> index 0000000..8f8746b >> >> >> >>> >> --- /dev/null >> >> >> >>> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram.txt >> >> >> >>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ >> >> >> >>> >> +Altera SOCFPGA SDRAM Controller >> >> >> >>> >> + >> >> >> >>> >> +Required properties: >> >> >> >>> >> +- compatible : "altr,sdr-ctl"; >> >> >> >>> >> +- reg : Should contain 1 register ranges(address and length) >> >> >> >>> >> + >> >> >> >>> >> +Example: >> >> >> >>> >> + sdrctl@ffc25000 { >> >> >> >>> >> + compatible = "altr,sdr-ctl"; >> >> >> >>> >> + reg = <0xffc25000 0x1000>; >> >> >> >>> >> + }; >> >> >> >>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi >> >> >> >>> >> index df43702..6ce912e 100644 >> >> >> >>> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi >> >> >> >>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi >> >> >> >>> >> @@ -676,6 +676,11 @@ >> >> >> >>> >> clocks = <&l4_sp_clk>; >> >> >> >>> >> }; >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> + sdrctl@ffc25000 { >> >> >> >>> >> + compatible = "altr,sdr-ctl", "syscon"; >> >> >> >>> > ^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > Get rid of that, too, please. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Hi Steffan, >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> I believe I need to keep the "syscon". The same register (ctrlcfg) >> >> >> >>> that has the ECC enable bitfield also includes the DRAM configuration >> >> >> >>> bitfields that other drivers will want to access (specifically the >> >> >> >>> FPGA bridge needs this information). Since this register will be >> >> >> >>> shared between drivers, syscon seems like the best solution. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hm, from looking at the documentation of the ctrlcfg I can't really >> >> >> >> understand which bits you would need for the FPGA brigde and why. >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Steffen, >> >> >> >> >> >> Offset 0x80 in the sdr-ctl is the "fpgaportrst" register. 14 bits >> >> >> wide, defaults to 0. When appropriate bits set to 1 in that reg, it >> >> >> allows an FPGA port to come out of reset (enables that port). Has no >> >> >> other effect on SDRAM configuration. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> That all sounds like stuff you would want to set for the specific >> >> >> >> RAM you are dealing with on a specific board. >> >> >> >> What bridge are you talking about? The SDRAM bridge? >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, the port allows the FPGA a direct path to the SDRAM. This one >> >> >> register the only register in the sdr that the bridge driver needs. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > So, what I suggested down ... >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I can see the problem with the ECC enable, though. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Steffen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> > sdrctl@ffc25000 { >> >> >> >>> > compatible = "altr,sdr-ctl"; >> >> >> >>> > reg = <0xffc25000 0x1000>; >> >> >> >>> > ranges; >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > edac@ffc2502c { >> >> >> >>> > compatible = "altr,sdram-edac"; >> >> >> >>> > reg = <0xffc2502c 0x50>; >> >> >> >>> > interrupts = <0 39 4>; >> >> >> >>> > }; >> >> >> >>> > }; >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > Then we can later add: >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > sdr-ports: ports@ffc2507c { >> >> >> >>> > #reset-cells = <1>; >> >> >> >>> > compatible = "altr,sdr-ports"; >> >> >> >>> > reg = <0xffc2507c 0x10>; >> >> >> >>> > clocks = <&ddr_dqs_clk>; >> >> >> >>> > ... >> >> >> >>> > }; >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > ... here should work. No?! Just a simple driver that registers with the >> >> > reset-framework. I would add 0x7c to that driver and than that driver could >> >> > "configure" the port and let it out of reset. >> >> > >> >> > I have done the same thing for the other 3 bridges, but am not finished yet. >> >> > Especially the GPV-stuff needs to at least be able to be added later if not now. >> >> > >> > >> > Hi Thor! >> > >> >> I'm not clear on how the EDAC driver will interact with the registers >> >> allocated to the SDRAM controller. If the group of registers from >> >> 0xffc25000 to 0xffc26000 is exclusively allocated to the SDRAM >> >> controller, how does the EDAC driver cleanly access that single >> >> register inside this range? >> >> >> > >> > The compatible in the example is wrong. I didn't mean to map the whole address space >> > to some driver. >> > I think for the configuration register syscon is the right approach. It is a >> > bag of bits that don't necessitate an own driver, so syscon is perfect. >> > >> > So, let me change my proposal to >> > >> > sdr-ctl: sdram@ffc25000 { >> > compatible = "altr,sdr-ctl", "syscon"; >> > reg = <0xffc25000 0x1>; >> > }; >> > >> > edac: edac@ffc2502c { >> > compatible = "altr,sdram-edac"; >> > reg = <0xffc2502c 0x50>; >> > interrupts = <0 39 4>; >> > config = <&sdr-ctl>; >> > ... >> > }; >> > >> > sdr-ports: ports@ffc2507c { >> > compatible = "altr,sdr-ports"; >> > reg = <0xffc2507c 0x10>; >> > clocks = <&ddr_dqs_clk>; >> > ... >> > }; >> > >> > Maybe we can just skip the outer node that combines all the others. >> > So, if we do it like that, you can still use syscon, but only for the register >> > that needs it. And the EDAC definitely needs access to the config register, so >> > all is good. >> > >> >> Is the solution that I don't use request_region() (and therefore not >> >> request exclusive access) when setting up the SDRAM controller? >> >> >> >> If you could point me to your drivers for the other bridges that you >> >> reference, your code may answer my question. >> >> >> > >> > The other bridges don't need access to any SDRAM controller registers and >> > I haven't even started to implement the GPV-stuff with the lw2hps-bridge :-( >> > >> > Regards, >> > Steffen >> > >> > -- >> > Pengutronix e.K. | | >> > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | >> > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | >> > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | >> >> OK now I understand. For register offset 0x0, that's all stuff set up >> in the bootloader. We won't be touching that register except for the >> EDAC. So syscon isn't needed here. >> >> Each driver that uses some sdr registers can specify which registers >> it uses in the device tree. So far we don't have any cases of two >> drivers that share a register. >> >> The ECC driver will need two ranges: offset 0x00 and 0x38 through 0x50. >> The fpga bridges just needs offset 0x80. >> > > Well, almost ;-) > Use syscon for 0x0 and reference that in the ECC driver, which only is > responsible for 0x38 to 0x50. Then flip the two EDAC bits via the syscon-phandle. > Then a bootloader can probe with the same dts and have a driver match on the > config-register and one for all the DRAM setup (< 0x38), which we don't need in > the kernel. On the other hand the EDAC seems unneccessary for the bootloader. > And this all matches the partitioning of the SDR register space, so I think it > is also a correct hardware description. > > Regards, > Steffen > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | We could do that. But is syscon a concept the bootloader will know about? Actually it is a bit messier than what I originally said: ECC driver needs two ranges: offset 0x00 and 0x38 through 0x50. Machine layer needs control of 0x10, 0x14, 0x54, and 0x58 for putting SDRAM into self-refresh. fpga bridges needs offset 0x80. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html