On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > + soc {
>> >> > + sbc_serial0: serial@9530000 {
>> >> > + status = "okay";
>> >> > + };
>> >>
>> >> You might want to consider reference-based syntax here instead, so you
>> >> don't have to mimic the hierarchy. That'd be (at the root level of the
>> >> file, below this secion:
>> >>
>> >> &sbc_serial0: {
>> >> status = "okay";
>> >> };
>> >
>> > I'm personally not keen on this scheme. It's sometimes helpful to know
>> > the hierarchy and I don't think it's a large overhead to format the
>> > subordinate DTS files in this way.
>> >
>> > Please consider not enforcing this.
>>
>> Definitely not enforcing it, and I didn't use to like it either but it
>> has some real upsides.
>>
>> In particular, it saves a lot of grief when you're changing something
>> like the unit-id of a node in .dtsi and forget to do the same update
>> in the dts.
>
> I'm not entirely sure what a unit-id is, but I can see that there
> would be benefits to using the referenced-based syntax as you call
> it. If any of those benefits hold true here I won't push back, but I
> would personally like to see us default to the hierarchical scheme.
Sorry, I meant unit-address. I.e. the portion that goes behind the @
in the node name.
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
