On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:50:22AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 05/14/2014 03:23 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:48:47PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> Maybe the third time's a charm :) > >> > >> This cleans up some DMA-API documentation and makes a minor no-op change to > >> the dma_declare_coherent_memory() prototype. > >> > >> Changes from v2: > >> - Added description of CPU virtual/physical and bus addresses in > >> DMA-API-HOWTO > >> - Added comments to sh/PCI (Dreamcast) update > >> - Dropped IOMMU interface dma_addr_t changes > >> > >> I didn't add Arnd's and Greg's acks to patch 1 because of all the new > >> address description text I added. > >> > >> --- > >> > >> Bjorn Helgaas (4): > >> DMA-API: Clarify physical/bus address distinction > >> DMA-API: Change dma_declare_coherent_memory() CPU address to phys_addr_t > >> sh/PCI: Pass GAPSPCI_DMA_BASE CPU & bus address to dma_declare_coherent_memory() > >> iommu/exynos: Remove unnecessary "&" from function pointers > > > > Applied patches 1-3 to my core branch and patch 4 to the arm/exynos > > branch. Patch 3 doesn't really belong into my tree, please let me know > > if there are any objections against it being there and I'll drop it. > > I was thinking that either Bjorn or I should merge patches 1 and 2. Okay, fine with me. Then I drop 1-3 entirely and only keep patch 4 in the exynos branch. Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
