On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Emilio López <emilio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "coherent" is written twice when it should be just once > > Signed-off-by: Emilio López <emilio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > The sentence still doesn't sound entirely correct in my head, maybe > someone can propose a better rewording. I added this patch to my series. I agree the wording is awkward, but I don't have a better proposal right now. > Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt b/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt > index 5e98303..4ede25a 100644 > --- a/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt > +++ b/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt > @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ the case would look like this: > goto ignore_this_device; > } > > -The coherent coherent mask will always be able to set the same or a > +The coherent mask will always be able to set the same or a > smaller mask as the streaming mask. However for the rare case that a > device driver only uses consistent allocations, one would have to > check the return value from dma_set_coherent_mask(). > -- > 1.9.2 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
