Hi, On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Add support to consume phy provided by Generic phy framework. >> > Keeping the support for older usb-phy intact right now, in order >> > to prevent any functionality break in absence of relevant >> > device tree side change for ohci-exynos. >> > Once we move to new phy in the device nodes for ohci, we can >> > remove the support for older phys. >> >> Any comments on this please. >> I think whatever the approach we follow, that can be common to both >> ehci-exynos[1], and ohci-exynos, since >> both are needed to move to the new generic phy framework, keeping >> support for older usb-phy >> so as to have smooth transition, in order to avoid any regression. > > I lost my copies of the ehci-exynos patch, but probably the same > comments apply as for the ohci-exynos patch. Ok, i will be reworking on the ehci-exynos patch also (which was earlier posted by Kamil [1]), after addressing the review comments on that, and will post the same. [1] [PATCH v6 8/8] usb: ehci-exynos: Change to use phy provided by the generic phy framework https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/29/298 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
