On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 03:04:32PM +0200, Carlo Caione wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> >> + regulators {
>> >> + compatible = "x-powers,axp20x-reg";
>
>> > This compatible isn't part of the driver.
>
>> Yes I know. The problem here is that in v4 I had to fill in the field
>> .of_compatible of the mfd_cell with "x-powers,axp20x-reg". This
>> because the regulator_dev_lookup() checks for dev->of_node when
>> looking for the supply so I needed the compatible string in the DT to
>> have the dev->of_node filled in by mfd_add_device().
>> What do you suggest? Modify the regulator driver?
>
> You're looking for regulator_bulk_register_supply_alias() in the MFD
> driver (via parent_supplies in the MFD cell probably).
Hi Mark,
I'm fighting with a small issue when using the
regulator_bulk_register_supply_alias(). Problem is that when using the
.parent_supplies entry in the MFD driver, I hit the
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dev->devres_head));
in linux/drivers/base/dd.c#L272, but, apart from the warning,
everything seems to work correctly.
A possible explanation I gave myself is that in the mfd_add_device()
we try to use the devm_* API when the regulator device is not bound to
the driver yet (I found some information here
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-June/104442.html).
Is this the case?
Thanks,
--
Carlo Caione
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
