Hi Vivek,
Please see my comments inline.
On 08.04.2014 16:36, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Add a new driver for the USB 3.0 PHY on Exynos5 series of SoCs.
The new driver uses the generic PHY framework and will interact
with DWC3 controller present on Exynos5 series of SoCs.
Thereby, removing old phy-samsung-usb3 driver and related code
used untill now which was based on usb/phy framework.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt | 42 ++
drivers/phy/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 668 ++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 722 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
[snip]
+ Additional clock required for Exynos5420:
+ - usb30_sclk_100m: Additional special clock used for PHY operation
+ depicted as 'sclk_usbphy30' in CMU of Exynos5420.
Are you sure this isn't simply a gate for the ref clock, as it can be
found on another SoC that is not upstream yet? I don't have
documentation for Exynos 5420 so I can't tell, but I'd like to ask you
to recheck this.
+- samsung,syscon-phandle: phandle for syscon interface, which is used to
+ control pmu registers for power isolation.
+- samsung,pmu-offset: phy power control register offset to pmu-system-controller
+ base.
+- #phy-cells : from the generic PHY bindings, must be 1;
+
+For "samsung,exynos5250-usbdrd-phy" and "samsung,exynos5420-usbdrd-phy"
+compatible PHYs, the second cell in the PHY specifier identifies the
+PHY id, which is interpreted as follows:
+ 0 - UTMI+ type phy,
+ 1 - PIPE3 type phy,
+
+Example:
+ usb3_phy: usbphy@12100000 {
+ compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-usbdrd-phy";
+ reg = <0x12100000 0x100>;
+ clocks = <&clock 286>, <&clock 1>;
+ clock-names = "phy", "usb3phy_refclk";
Binding description above doesn't mention "usb3phy_refclk" entry.
+ samsung,syscon-phandle = <&pmu_syscon>;
+ samsung,pmu-offset = <0x704>;
+ #phy-cells = <1>;
+ };
[snip]
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ff54a7c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
[snip]
+static int exynos5_usbdrd_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
+ struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd;
+ struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
+ struct resource *res;
+ const struct of_device_id *match;
+ const struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy_drvdata *drv_data;
+ struct regmap *reg_pmu;
+ u32 pmu_offset;
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * Exynos systems are completely DT enabled,
+ * so lets not have any platform data support for this driver.
+ */
+ if (!node) {
+ dev_err(dev, "no device node found\n");
This error message is not very meaningful. I'd rather use something like
"This driver can be only instantiated using Device Tree".
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ match = of_match_node(exynos5_usbdrd_phy_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
+ if (!match) {
+ dev_err(dev, "of_match_node() failed\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ drv_data = match->data;
+
+ phy_drd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*phy_drd), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!phy_drd)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ dev_set_drvdata(dev, phy_drd);
+ phy_drd->dev = dev;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ phy_drd->reg_phy = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(phy_drd->reg_phy)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to map register memory (phy)\n");
devm_ioremap_resource() already prints an error message.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
