On 03/31/2014 09:04 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> do_initcall_level(level);
>> +
>> + list_for_each_safe(tmp, next, &blacklisted_initcalls) {
>> + entry = list_entry(tmp, struct blacklist_entry, next);
>> + free_bootmem(entry->buf, strlen(entry->buf));
>> + free_bootmem(entry, sizeof(*entry));
>
> Does that really work? At this point the bootmem allocator should
> be already finished, so no memory will be freed.
Oh, geez ... that's a good point. I completely missed that.
>
> For this case it's probably ok to leak it.
Okay ... maybe that's an option.
>
> Alternatively you could use static arrays and storing pointer/len.
>
Yeah, I was thinking about the pros-cons of doing static vs. dynamic. I was
planning on doing an array of 5 but kept falling into the trap of "how much is
too much or too little?".
Does anyone object to a static array? If not I'll bang out a static version for
[v3] tomorrow ...
P.
> -Andi
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
