On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:40:55AM +0000, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:09:20PM +0000, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.txt | 41 ++++++
> > > drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c | 144 +++++++++++++++-----
> > > 2 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.txt
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.txt
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..e5adc76
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.txt
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> > > +FocalTech EDT-FT5x06 Polytouch driver
> > > +=====================================
> > > +
> > > +Required properties:
> > > + - compatible: "edt,edt-ft5x06"
> >
> > Is the 'x' part of a particular product name, or is this a class of
> > devices?
> >
> The FT5x06 datasheet lists 3 variants for different panel sizes.
> I'll add distinct compatible strings for those chips, though their SW
> interface is (currently) identical:
> |Required properties:
> | - compatible: "edt,edt-ft5206", "edt,edt-ft5x06"
> | or: "edt,edt-ft5306", "edt,edt-ft5x06"
> | or: "edt,edt-ft5406", "edt,edt-ft5x06"
Drop the "edt,edt-ft5x06" string. If they really appear to be identical
from a programmer's perspective, choose a particular variant to be used
as the fallback.
There could be a future variant that would appear to match the x string
yet was completely incompatible with the expected programming interface.
> > > + - reg: I2C slave address of the chip (0x38)
> > > + - interrupt-parent: a phandle pointing to the interrupt controller
> > > + serving the interrupt for this chip
> > > + - interrupts: interrupt specification for this chip
> >
> > How many? What are they for?
> >
> I'll change it to:
> | - interrupts: interrupt specification for the touchdetect
> | interrupt
That sounds fine to me.
> > > + - report_rate: allows setting the report rate in the range from 3 to
> > > + 14.
> >
> > However, why can the kernel not decide the report rate? This doesn't
> > sound like something that needs to vary per-board.
> >
> > Also, s/_/-/ in property names, please.
> >
> OK, I'll drop the property, which also simplyfies the code a bit.
Sounds good to me.
>
> > > +#define EDT_GET_PROP(name, reg) { \
> > > + const u32 *prop = of_get_property(np, #name, NULL); \
> > > + if (prop) \
> > > + edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, be32_to_cpu(*prop)); \
> > > +}
> >
> > Use of_property_read_u32, it'll handle endianness conversion for you.
> >
> > Use of of_get_property is almost always wrong.
> >
> Sure.
Cheers,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
