On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:08:02PM -0500, Paul Handrigan wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Brian Austin wrote: > >Driver looks good to me. I think we should name it the cs42xx8 since this > >actually covers CS42448 and CS42888. The CS42888 is derived from the > >CS42448. > V3 looks good. As Brian said, the name should be changed to cs42xx8. Great, so if Nicolin resubmits with the rename when he gets back he can add acks from both of you? The driver looked fine to me too.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
