On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 04:43:39PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote: > Bindings documentation for the AXP20x driver. In this file also two > sub-nodes (PEK and regulators) are documented. PEK doesn't look to be documented, either in this patch, or any other. > Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <carlo@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + I don't really know what the DT maintainers are expecting here, but I would have done two patches. > 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..982aefe > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ > +* axp20x device tree bindings > + > +The axp20x family current members :- > +axp202 (X-Powers) > +axp209 (X-Powers) > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible : Should be "x-powers,axp202" or "x-powers,axp209" > +- interrupt-controller : axp20x has its own internal IRQs > +- #interrupt-cells : Should be set to 1 > +- interrupt-parent : The parent interrupt controller > +- interrupts : Interrupt specifiers for interrupt sources > +- reg : The I2C slave address for the AXP chip > + > +Sub-nodes: > +* regulators : Contain the regulator nodes. The regulators are bound using > + their name as listed here: dcdc2, dcdc3, ldo1, ldo2, ldo3, > + ldo4, ldo5. > + The bindings details of individual regulator device can be found in: > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt with the > + exception of: > + > + - dcdc-freq : defines the work frequency of DC-DC in KHz > + (range: 750-1875). Default: 1.5MHz > + - dcdc-workmode : Optional. 1 for PWM mode, 0 for AUTO mode > + Default: AUTO mode Those two are x-powers specific, or would it make sense to have them in other drivers too? If the former, please add the x-powers prefix. > + > +Example: > + > +axp: axp20x@34 { > + reg = <0x34>; > + interrupt-parent = <&nmi_intc>; > + interrupts = <0 8>; > + > + compatible = "x-powers,axp209"; > + interrupt-controller; > + #interrupt-cells = <1>; > + > + regulators { Do we really need that subnode ? it looks useless, and we already know that we are defining regulators here. > + dcdc-freq = "1500"; That frequency is defined at the same level than the dcdc-workmode property, yet they both seem to be placed at different levels. > + > + axp_dcdc2: dcdc2 { > + regulator-min-microvolt = <700000>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <2275000>; > + dcdc-workmode = <0>; > + regulator-always-on; > + }; > + > + axp_dcdc3: dcdc3 { > + regulator-min-microvolt = <700000>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <3500000>; > + dcdc-workmode = <0>; It looks like those are at their default values? Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature