On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 03/17/2014 01:47 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Harini Katakam <harinik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Add driver for Cadence SPI controller. This is used in Xilinx Zynq.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Harini Katakam <harinik@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-cadence.txt | 25 +
>>
>> We prefer binding docs in separate patch.
>
> I have heard several times that also for binding review you need driver
> to look if this binding make sense that's why Harini sent this together.
> It means 2 emails instead of one.
> But if you wish to have this in two files no problem to split it
> but then I believe both should be copied to DT mailing list.
Yes, for 2 reasons:
- To prepare for DT bindings to get merged to separate repo if we ever
get there.
- So DT maintainers can review/ack just the bindings.
>>> +- reg : Physical base address and size of SPI registers map.
>>> +- interrupts : Property with a value describing the interrupt
>>> + number.
>>> +- interrupt-parent : Must be core interrupt controller
>>> +- clock-names : List of input clock names - "ref_clk", "pclk"
>>> + (See clock bindings for details).
>>> +- clocks : Clock phandles (see clock bindings for details).
>>> +- num-chip-select : Number of chip selects used.
>>
>> See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt. Use "num-cs" here.
>>
>>> +
>>> +Example:
>>> +
>>> + spi@e0007000 {
>>> + clock-names = "ref_clk", "pclk";
>>> + clocks = <&clkc 26>, <&clkc 35>;
>>> + compatible = "cdns,spi-r1p6";
>>
>> Nit. We usually put compatible first in the node.
>
> Our device-tree generator sorts them that's why it is just like this
> but not a problem to fix just in documentation.
>
>
>>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>>> + interrupts = <0 49 4>;
>>> + num-chip-select = /bits/ 16 <4>;
>
> I was expecting you will comment this a little bit. :-)
> Because all just reading this num-cs as 32bit and then
> assigning this value to master->num_chipselect which is 16bit.
Well, everyone else has that problem then. Obviously it takes a bit
more care than just reading into a u32, but that is a kernel problem
and not a problem of the binding.
>>> +/* Macros for the SPI controller read/write */
>>> +#define cdns_spi_read(addr) readl_relaxed(addr)
>>> +#define cdns_spi_write(addr, val) writel_relaxed((val), (addr))
>>
>> Just use readl/writel directly.
>
> There shouldn't be any problem to use these helper macros
> and even I think this is better than using readl/writel directly
> because you are more flexible if you want to change it to different
> IO.
Then when I read the code I have to go lookup what they do while I
know exactly what writel/readl do already. It is really the same
reasons as why the kernel doesn't have register set and clear bits
accessors.
>>> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>>> + if (irq < 0) {
>>
>> I believe this returns NO_IRQ which could be 0.
>>
>> s/</<=/
>
> Are you sure regarding this?
> NO_IRQ on ARM is -1.
> And IRC irq = 0 should be just valid number.
>
> But if you are right then others drivers have to fixed too.
The definition varies by arch being 0 or -1, so drivers need to deal
with both. The preference is 0 is NO_IRQ. It has been decreed by
Linus. ARM is actually pretty close to being able to change NO_IRQ to
0.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
