On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 02:44:00PM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > Le 17/03/2014 12:55, Mark Brown a écrit : > >On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:45:40PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: > >If this is a clock for the CODEC it should be documented as part of the > >binding for the CODEC and connected to the CODEC in the device tree > >rather than being part of a machine driver binding. > Tell me if I'm mistaken, but doing this would implies a lot of changes. > The current wm8904 driver does not handle clk retrieval and configuration, > and I'm afraid that introducing these concepts would break other drivers > (those > connecting to a wm8904 codec). Currently the only mainline users of the device are the Atmel drivers. > How about adding CCF support as proposed in this series and think about a > cleaner > solution for a future release ? No, DT is an ABI so you can't do that - once something is in DT we're stuck supporting it so we can't do quick hacks so easily.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature