On Saturday 15 March 2014, Tanmay Inamdar wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thursday 06 March 2014, Tanmay Inamdar wrote: > >> + pcie0: pcie@1f2b0000 { > >> + status = "disabled"; > >> + device_type = "pci"; > >> + compatible = "apm,xgene-storm-pcie", "apm,xgene-pcie"; > >> + #interrupt-cells = <1>; > >> + #size-cells = <2>; > >> + #address-cells = <3>; > >> + reg = < 0x00 0x1f2b0000 0x0 0x00010000 /* Controller registers */ > >> + 0xe0 0xd0000000 0x0 0x00200000>; /* PCI config space */ > >> + reg-names = "csr", "cfg"; > >> + ranges = <0x01000000 0x00 0x00000000 0xe0 0x00000000 0x00 0x00010000 /* io */ > >> + 0x02000000 0x00 0x10000000 0xe0 0x10000000 0x00 0x80000000>; /* mem */ > >> + dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x40 0x00000000 0x40 0x00000000 0x40 0x00000000>; > >> + interrupt-map-mask = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x7>; > >> + interrupt-map = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x1 &gic 0x0 0xc2 0x1 > >> + 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x2 &gic 0x0 0xc3 0x1 > >> + 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x3 &gic 0x0 0xc4 0x1 > >> + 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x4 &gic 0x0 0xc5 0x1>; > >> + clocks = <&pcie0clk 0>; > >> + }; > > > > Is 0x40.0x00000000 the start of your RAM? I had expected RAM to start at 0.0, > > and in that case the dma-ranges property would be wrong. > > RAM starting address is 0x40_00000000. Ok, it's good then. Thanks for the clarification, I keep losing track of how each of the ~40 SoCs I'm dealing with handles these things. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html