> >>>From: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>>This patch adds a new logic inside the st pinctrl to manage
> >>>an unsupported scenario: some sysconfig are not available!
> >>>
> >>>This is the case of STiH407 where, although documented, the
> >>>following registers from SYSCFG_FLASH have been removed from the SoC.
> >>>
> >>>SYSTEM_CONFIG3040
> >>> Output Enable pad control for all PIO Alternate Functions
> >>>and
> >>>SYSTEM_ CONFIG3050
> >>> Pull Up pad control for all PIO Alternate Functions
> >>>
> >>>Without managing this condition an imprecise external abort
> >>>will be detect.
> >>>
> >>>To do this the patch also reviews the st_parse_syscfgs
> >>>and other routines to manipulate the registers only if
> >>>actually available.
> >>>In any case, for example the st_parse_syscfgs detected
> >>>an error condition but no action was made in the
> >>>st_pctl_probe_dt.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@xxxxxx>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx>
> >>>+
> >>>+static struct regmap_field *st_pc_get_value(struct device *dev,
> >>>+ struct regmap *regmap, int bank,
> >>>+ int data, int lsb, int msb)
> >>>+{
> >>>+ struct reg_field reg = REG_FIELD((data + bank) * 4, lsb, msb);
> >>>+
> >>>+ if (data < 0)
> >>>+ return NULL;
> >>
> >>What happens is data < 0 and it's used in REG_FIELD?
> >Nothing bad, but I agree this is not crystal clear.
> >
> >>Would it make more sense to make this check before calling REG_FIELD?
> >Yes, it will be done in the v4.
>
> Finally, I have to keep it as it was if I want this patch to compile.
Ah, why's that?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
