On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:36:03 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello. > > On 02/05/2014 03:08 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> I'm afraid that's too late, it has spread very far, so that > >>>>>>>>> of_get_phy_mode() handles that property, not "phy-connection-type". > > >>>>>>>> Uggg, I guess this is a case of a defacto standard then if the kernel > >>>>>>>> doesn't even support it. > > >>>>>>> Maybe I forgot to CC you on patch sent to Grant only, I sent a patch a > >>>>>>> while ago for of_get_phy_mode() to look for both "phy-mode" and > >>>>>>> "phy-connection-type" since the former has been a Linux invention, but > >>>>>>> the latter is ePAPR specified. > > >>>>>> Here is a link to the actual patch in question, not sure which tree > >>>>>> Grant applied it to though: > > >>>>>> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1311.2/00048.html > > >>>>> It's not the patch mail, it's Grant's "applied" reply, patch is mangled in > >>>>> this reply, and I couldn't follow the thread. Here's the actual patch mail: > > >>>>> http://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=138449662807254 > > >>>> Florian, I didn't find this patch in Grant's official tree, so maybe you > >>>> should ask him where is the patch already? > > >>> Sorry, I accidentally dropped it. It will be in the next merge window. > > >> Already saw it, thanks. Would that it was in 3.14 instead of course, so > >> that I could use "phy-connection-type" in my binding... > > > Is 3.14 broken because of missing the patch? If so I'll get it merged as > > a bug fix. > > No, it's not. I could have used "phy-connection-type" in my binding > destined for 3.15 and document it as a preferred property as well. You still can. We just need to make sure that your patch is applied on top of the phy-connection-type patch. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
