On 01/29/14 18:27, Henrik Austad wrote:
Some of the 00-INDEX files are somewhat outdated and some folders does not
contain 00-INDEX at all. Only outdated (with the notably exception of
spi) indexes are touched here, the 169 folders without 00-INDEX has not
been touched.
This applies to Linus' tip (0e47c969).
Looks like an improvement.
Acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
(My own scripts to find this stuff are based on maintaining
http://kernel.org/doc and the kernel developers are no longer capable of
providing rsync access to that, despite repeated requests. Most recently
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52721 )
However, I'm curious about this bit:
--- a/Documentation/00-INDEX
+++ b/Documentation/00-INDEX
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-This is a brief list of all the files in ./linux/Documentation and what
-they contain. If you add a documentation file, please list it here in
-alphabetical order as well, or risk being hunted down like a rabid dog.
-Please keep the descriptions small enough to fit on one line.
- Thanks -- Paul G.
+# This is a brief list of all the files in ./linux/Documentation and what
+# they contain. If you add a documentation file, please list it here in
+# alphabetical order as well, or risk being hunted down like a rabid dog.
+# Please keep the descriptions small enough to fit on one line.
+# Thanks -- Paul G.
-Following translations are available on the WWW:
+# Following translations are available on the WWW:
Is there a reason for that?
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
