On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We're only seeing Arnd's side of the conversation on linux-pci. > Tanmay, are your messages being rejected because they're too "fancy", > per the definition here: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ? > Thanks for pointing out. I am not sure though what's being detected as fancy. I checked that my emails are received as plaintext on majordomo. They are also displayed fine on LKML. In this email, I have tried to keep the format of to: and cc: same as first email in the thread. Not sure if this fixes the problem. Again.. sorry for spamming. > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Friday 24 January 2014 13:28:22 Tanmay Inamdar wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >> On Wednesday 15 January 2014, Tanmay Inamdar wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >>> +static void xgene_pcie_poll_linkup(struct xgene_pcie_port *port, u32 *lanes) >>> >>> +{ >>> >>> + void *csr_base = port->csr_base; >>> >>> + u32 val32; >>> >>> + u64 start_time, time; >>> >>> + >>> >>> + /* >>> >>> + * A component enters the LTSSM Detect state within >>> >>> + * 20ms of the end of fundamental core reset. >>> >>> + */ >>> >>> + msleep(XGENE_LTSSM_DETECT_WAIT); >>> >>> + port->link_up = 0; >>> >>> + start_time = jiffies; >>> >>> + do { >>> >>> + val32 = readl(csr_base + PCIECORE_CTLANDSTATUS); >>> >>> + if (val32 & LINK_UP_MASK) { >>> >>> + port->link_up = 1; >>> >>> + port->link_speed = PIPE_PHY_RATE_RD(val32); >>> >>> + val32 = readl(csr_base + BRIDGE_STATUS_0); >>> >>> + *lanes = val32 >> 26; >>> >>> + } >>> >>> + time = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - start_time); >>> >>> + } while ((!port->link_up) || (time <= XGENE_LTSSM_L0_WAIT)); >>> >>> +} >>> >> >>> >> Maybe another msleep() in the loop? It seems weird to first do an >>> >> unconditional sleep but then busy-wait for the result. >>> > >>> > ok. >>> >>> This loop can execute for maximum 4 msec. So putting msleep(1) won't >>> get us much. >> >> 4 msec is still quite a long time for a busy loop that can be spent doing >> useful work in another thread. >> >>> >> >>> >> Another general note: Your "compatible" strings are rather unspecific. >>> >> Do you have a version number for this IP block? I suppose that it's related >>> >> to one that has been used in other chips before, or will be used in future >>> >> chips, if it's not actually licensed from some other company. >>> > >>> > I will have to check this. >>> > >>> >>> We have decided to stick with current compatible string for now. >> >> Can you elaborate on your reasoning? Does this mean X-Gene is a one-off >> product and you won't be doing any new chips based on the same hardware >> components? >> >> Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
