On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:20:15PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Add in Documentation/scheduler/ some hints about the design
> choices, the usage and the future possible developments of the
> sched_dl scheduling class and of the SCHED_DEADLINE policy.
>
> Cc: bruce.ashfield@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: claudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: darren@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: dhaval.giani@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: fchecconi@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: harald.gustafsson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: hgu1972@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: insop.song@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: johan.eker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: liming.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: mingo@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: nicola.manica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: oleg@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: p.faure@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: rob@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [ Re-wrote sections 2 and 3. ]
> Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/scheduler/00-INDEX | 2 +
> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 281 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 +-
> 3 files changed, 285 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/00-INDEX b/Documentation/scheduler/00-INDEX
> index d2651c4..46702e4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/scheduler/00-INDEX
> +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/00-INDEX
> @@ -10,5 +10,7 @@ sched-nice-design.txt
> - How and why the scheduler's nice levels are implemented.
> sched-rt-group.txt
> - real-time group scheduling.
> +sched-deadline.txt
> + - deadline scheduling.
> sched-stats.txt
> - information on schedstats (Linux Scheduler Statistics).
> diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..18adc92
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
> + Deadline Task Scheduling
> + ------------------------
> +
> +CONTENTS
> +========
> +
> + 0. WARNING
> + 1. Overview
> + 2. Scheduling algorithm
> + 3. Scheduling Real-Time Tasks
> + 4. Bandwidth management
> + 4.1 System-wide settings
> + 4.2 Task interface
> + 4.3 Default behavior
> + 5. Tasks CPU affinity
> + 5.1 SCHED_DEADLINE and cpusets HOWTO
> + 6. Future plans
> +
> +
> +0. WARNING
> +==========
> +
> + Fiddling with these settings can result in an unpredictable or even unstable
> + system behavior. As for -rt (group) scheduling, it is assumed that root users
> + know what they're doing.
> +
> +
> +1. Overview
> +===========
> +
> + The SCHED_DEADLINE policy contained inside the sched_dl scheduling class is
> + basically an implementation of the Earliest Deadline First (EDF) scheduling
> + algorithm, augmented with a mechanism (called Constant Bandwidth Server, CBS)
> + that makes it possible to isolate the behavior of tasks between each other.
> +
> +
> +2. Scheduling algorithm
> +==================
> +
> + SCHED_DEADLINE uses three parameters, named "runtime", "period", and
> + "deadline" to schedule tasks. A SCHED_DEADLINE task is guaranteed to receive
> + "runtime" microseconds of execution time every "period" microseconds, and
> + these "runtime" microseconds are available within "deadline" microseconds
> + from the beginning of the period. In order to implement this behaviour,
> + every time the task wakes up, the scheduler computes a "scheduling deadline"
> + consistent with the guarantee (using the CBS[2,3] algorithm). Tasks are then
> + scheduled using EDF[1] on these scheduling deadlines (the task with the
> + smallest scheduling deadline is selected for execution). Notice that this
> + guaranteed is respected if a proper "admission control" strategy (see Section
> + "4. Bandwidth management") is used.
> +
> + Summing up, the CBS[2,3] algorithms assigns scheduling deadlines to tasks so
> + that each task runs for at most its runtime every period, avoiding any
> + interference between different tasks (bandwidth isolation), while the EDF[1]
> + algorithm selects the task with the smallest scheduling deadline as the one
> + to be executed first. Thanks to this feature, also tasks that do not
> + strictly comply with the "traditional" real-time task model (see Section 3)
> + can effectively use the new policy.
> +
> + In more details, the CBS algorithm assigns scheduling deadlines to
> + tasks in the following way:
> +
> + - Each SCHED_DEADLINE task is characterised by the "runtime",
> + "deadline", and "period" parameters;
> +
> + - The state of the task is described by a "scheduling deadline", and
> + a "current runtime". These two parameters are initially set to 0;
> +
> + - When a SCHED_DEADLINE task wakes up (becomes ready for execution),
> + the scheduler checks if
> +
> + current runtime runtime
> + ---------------------------------- > ----------------
> + scheduling deadline - current time period
> +
> + then, if the scheduling deadline is smaller than the current time, or
> + this condition is verified, the scheduling deadline and the
> + current budget are re-initialised as
Current runtime: time spent running _this_ period? or is _remaining_
runtime this period? I get the feeling it's the latter.
So, roughly, it is the ration
remaining_runtime / relative_time_to_deadline
which needs to be greater than the assigned CPU bandwidth, and if so, the
budget should be replensihed?
Shouldn't there be something about not refilling the budget before a new
period has started?
> + scheduling deadline = current time + deadline
> + current runtime = runtime
> +
> + otherwise, the scheduling deadline and the current runtime are
> + left unchanged;
> +
> + - When a SCHED_DEADLINE task executes for an amount of time t, its
> + current runtime is decreased as
> +
> + current runtime = current runtime - t
> +
> + (technically, the runtime is decreased at every tick, or when the
> + task is descheduled / preempted);
Aha, there it is. Having it here makes sense, but it does wrapping ones
head around this a bit harder than strictly necessary perhaps.
> + - When the current runtime becomes less or equal than 0, the task is
> + said to be "throttled" (also known as "depleted" in real-time literature)
> + and cannot be scheduled until its scheduling deadline. The "replenishment
> + time" for this task (see next item) is set to be equal to the current
> + value of the scheduling deadline;
> +
> + - When the current time is equal to the replenishment time of a
> + throttled task, the scheduling deadline and the current runtime are
> + updated as
> +
> + scheduling deadline = scheduling deadline + period
> + current runtime = current runtime + runtime
ok, this section makes sense now
> +3. Scheduling Real-Time Tasks
> +=============================
> +
> + * BIG FAT WARNING ******************************************************
> + *
> + * This section contains a (not-thorough) summary on classical deadline
> + * scheduling theory, and how it applies to SCHED_DEADLINE.
"This section should not be considered a complete summary of classical
deadline scheduling theroy in any way AT ALL."
(not-thorough sounds a bit strange)
> + * The reader can "safely" skip to Section 4 if only interested in seeing
> + * how the scheduling policy can be used. Anyway, we strongly recommend
> + * to come back here and continue reading (once the urge for testing is
> + * satisfied :P) to be sure of fully understanding all technical details.
> + ************************************************************************
> +
> + There are no limitations on what kind of task can exploit this new
> + scheduling discipline, even if it must be said that it is particularly
> + suited for periodic or sporadic real-time tasks that need guarantees on their
> + timing behavior, e.g., multimedia, streaming, control applications, etc.
> +
> + A typical real-time task is composed of a repetition of computation phases
> + (task instances, or jobs) which are activated on a periodic or sporadic
> + fashion.
> + Each job J_j (where J_j is the j^th job of the task) is characterised by an
> + arrival time r_j (the time when the job starts), an amount of computation
> + time c_j needed to finish the job, and a job absolute deadline d_j, which
> + is the time within which the job should be finished. The maximum execution
> + time max_j{c_j} is called "Worst Case Execution Time" (WCET) for the task.
> + A real-time task can be periodic with period P if r_{j+1} = r_j + P, or
> + sporadic with minimum inter-arrival time P is r_{j+1} >= r_j + P. Finally,
> + d_j = r_j + D, where D is the task's relative deadline.
\o/
Great, thanks!
> + SCHED_DEADLINE can be used to schedule real-time tasks guaranteeing that
> + the jobs' deadlines of a task are respected. In order to do this, a task
> + must be scheduled by setting:
> +
> + - runtime >= WCET
> + - deadline = D
> + - period <= P
> +
> + IOW, if runtime >= WCET and if period is >= P, then the scheduling deadlines
> + and the absolute deadlines (d_j) coincide, so a proper admission control
> + allows to respect the jobs' absolute deadlines for this task (this is what is
> + called "hard schedulability property" and is an extension of Lemma 1 of [2]).
> +
> + References:
> + 1 - C. L. Liu and J. W. Layland. Scheduling algorithms for multiprogram-
> + ming in a hard-real-time environment. Journal of the Association for
> + Computing Machinery, 20(1), 1973.
> + 2 - L. Abeni , G. Buttazzo. Integrating Multimedia Applications in Hard
> + Real-Time Systems. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Real-time Systems
> + Symposium, 1998. http://retis.sssup.it/~giorgio/paps/1998/rtss98-cbs.pdf
> + 3 - L. Abeni. Server Mechanisms for Multimedia Applications. ReTiS Lab
> + Technical Report. http://xoomer.virgilio.it/lucabe72/pubs/tr-98-01.ps
> +
> +4. Bandwidth management
> +=======================
> +
> + In order for the -deadline scheduling to be effective and useful, it is
> + important to have some method to keep the allocation of the available CPU
> + bandwidth to the tasks under control.
> + This is usually called "admission control" and if it is not performed at all,
> + no guarantee can be given on the actual scheduling of the -deadline tasks.
> +
> + Since when RT-throttling has been introduced each task group has a bandwidth
> + associated, calculated as a certain amount of runtime over a period.
> + Moreover, to make it possible to manipulate such bandwidth, readable/writable
> + controls have been added to both procfs (for system wide settings) and cgroupfs
> + (for per-group settings).
> + Therefore, the same interface is being used for controlling the bandwidth
> + distrubution to -deadline tasks.
> +
> + However, more discussion is needed in order to figure out how we want to manage
> + SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth at the task group level. Therefore, SCHED_DEADLINE
> + uses (for now) a less sophisticated, but actually very sensible, mechanism to
> + ensure that a certain utilization cap is not overcome per each root_domain.
> +
> + Another main difference between deadline bandwidth management and RT-throttling
> + is that -deadline tasks have bandwidth on their own (while -rt ones don't!),
> + and thus we don't need an higher level throttling mechanism to enforce the
> + desired bandwidth.
> +
> +4.1 System wide settings
> +------------------------
> +
> + The system wide settings are configured under the /proc virtual file system.
> +
> + For now the -rt knobs are used for dl admission control and the -deadline
> + runtime is accounted against the -rt runtime. We realise that this isn't
> + entirely desirable; however, it is better to have a small interface for now,
> + and be able to change it easily later. The ideal situation (see 5.) is to run
> + -rt tasks from a -deadline server; in which case the -rt bandwidth is a direct
> + subset of dl_bw.
> +
> + This means that, for a root_domain comprising M CPUs, -deadline tasks
> + can be created while the sum of their bandwidths stays below:
> +
> + M * (sched_rt_runtime_us / sched_rt_period_us)
> +
> + It is also possible to disable this bandwidth management logic, and
> + be thus free of oversubscribing the system up to any arbitrary level.
> + This is done by writing -1 in /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us.
> +
> +
> +4.2 Task interface
> +------------------
> +
> + Specifying a periodic/sporadic task that executes for a given amount of
> + runtime at each instance, and that is scheduled according to the urgency of
> + its own timing constraints needs, in general, a way of declaring:
> + - a (maximum/typical) instance execution time,
> + - a minimum interval between consecutive instances,
> + - a time constraint by which each instance must be completed.
> +
> + Therefore:
> + * a new struct sched_attr, containing all the necessary fields is
> + provided;
> + * the new scheduling related syscalls that manipulate it, i.e.,
> + sched_setattr() and sched_getattr() are implemented.
> +
> +
> +4.3 Default behavior
> +---------------------
> +
> + The default value for SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth is to have rt_runtime equal to
> + 950000. With rt_period equal to 1000000, by default, it means that -deadline
> + tasks can use at most 95%, multiplied by the number of CPUs that compose the
> + root_domain, for each root_domain.
> +
> + A -deadline task cannot fork.
> +
> +5. Tasks CPU affinity
> +=====================
> +
> + -deadline tasks cannot have an affinity mask smaller that the entire
> + root_domain they are created on. However, affinities can be specified
> + through the cpuset facility (Documentation/cgroups/cpusets.txt).
> +
> +5.1 SCHED_DEADLINE and cpusets HOWTO
> +------------------------------------
> +
> + An example of a simple configuration (pin a -deadline task to CPU0)
> + follows (rt-app is used to create a -deadline task).
> +
> + mkdir /dev/cpuset
> + mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /dev/cpuset
> + cd /dev/cpuset
> + mkdir cpu0
> + echo 0 > cpu0/cpuset.cpus
> + echo 0 > cpu0/cpuset.mems
> + echo 1 > cpuset.cpu_exclusive
> + echo 0 > cpuset.sched_load_balance
> + echo 1 > cpu0/cpuset.cpu_exclusive
> + echo 1 > cpu0/cpuset.mem_exclusive
> + echo $$ > cpu0/tasks
> + rt-app -t 100000:10000:d:0 -D5 (it is now actually superfluous to specify
> + task affinity)
> +
> +6. Future plans
> +===============
> +
> + Still missing:
> +
> + - refinements to deadline inheritance, especially regarding the possibility
> + of retaining bandwidth isolation among non-interacting tasks. This is
> + being studied from both theoretical and practical points of view, and
> + hopefully we should be able to produce some demonstrative code soon;
> + - (c)group based bandwidth management, and maybe scheduling;
> + - access control for non-root users (and related security concerns to
> + address), which is the best way to allow unprivileged use of the mechanisms
> + and how to prevent non-root users "cheat" the system?
> +
> + As already discussed, we are planning also to merge this work with the EDF
> + throttling patches [https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/23/239] but we still are in
> + the preliminary phases of the merge and we really seek feedback that would
> + help us decide on the direction it should take.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 0de2482..0dd5e09 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -351,7 +351,8 @@ static void replenish_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
> * disrupting the schedulability of the system. Otherwise, we should
> * refill the runtime and set the deadline a period in the future,
> * because keeping the current (absolute) deadline of the task would
> - * result in breaking guarantees promised to other tasks.
> + * result in breaking guarantees promised to other tasks (refer to
> + * Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt for more informations).
> *
> * This function returns true if:
> *
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Nice! /me is very happy
Reviewed-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Henrik Austad
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
