On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 05:40:09PM +0000, Gupta, Pekon wrote: > Hi Shijie, > > >From: Jagan Teki [mailto:jagannadh.teki@xxxxxxxxx] > [...] > > > >I feel these are good points to discuss all. > >1. With new framework seems like we need two separate controller drivers > > one for non spi-nor and one for spi-nor with single controller hw > >2. With spi-nor implementation though the hw is spi complaint but the sw is > > completely ignoring the Linux SPI core interaction. > > > >I feel above two points are technically wrong - Please correct me if am wrong > >but need all developers will join..thanks! > > > I have been following this patch-set from sometime, And I think point (2) > has been discussed back and forth in multiple times in earlier discussions. > So, Is it possible for you to summarize point (2) with all pros-n-cons ? > > - A README will helpful to clear all doubts and will ease your implementation > as well. > - It will also help in reducing turn-around time to get this framework in > acceptable state and still keep it generic enough. > > You can submit the README as Documentation/mtd/spi-nor.txt okay. thanks Huang Shijie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
