On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:20:02 +0100
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:18:57AM +0100, Kory Maincent wrote:
> > static u8 pd692x0_build_msg(struct pd692x0_msg *msg, u8 echo)
> > @@ -739,6 +755,29 @@ pd692x0_pi_get_actual_pw(struct pse_controller_dev
> > *pcdev, int id) return (buf.data[0] << 4 | buf.data[1]) * 100;
> > }
> >
> > +static int
> > +pd692x0_pi_get_prio(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev, int id)
> > +{
> > + struct pd692x0_priv *priv = to_pd692x0_priv(pcdev);
> > + struct pd692x0_msg msg, buf = {0};
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = pd692x0_fw_unavailable(priv);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + msg = pd692x0_msg_template_list[PD692X0_MSG_GET_PORT_PARAM];
> > + msg.sub[2] = id;
> > + ret = pd692x0_sendrecv_msg(priv, &msg, &buf);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + if (buf.data[2] < 1 || 3 < buf.data[2])
>
> if (!buf.data[2] || buf.data[2] > pcdev->pis_prio_max + 1)
Oh indeed that is better, thanks!
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
