On 19. 03. 25, 19:01, Randy Dunlap wrote:
@@ -15,45 +15,64 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing identical callback
mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
handlers as irqchips. I.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
-Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
-hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
-be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
-interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
-interrupt line to the CPU) nowadays this number is just a number.
+So in the past, IRQ numbers could be chosen so that they match the
+hardware IRQ line into the root interrupt controller (i.e. the
+component actually firing the interrupt line to the CPU). Nowadays,
+this number is just a number and the number loose all kind of
loses
Thanks, fixed in 55/57 where I explicitly do "3rd person -> add 's' to
verbs.". Even though this was "loose" and not "lose" ;).
--
js
suse labs
