On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:48 AM, boris brezillon <b.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 19/12/2013 19:22, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> that's quite a weird argument from Linus W, considering you _do_ have a >> discrete mux on the board. > >> We have quite a few of such "crazy" scenarios here at TI and we were >> going to send a pinctrl-gpio driver. Hm I'm all in the blue as to what a "pinctrl-gpio driver" is ... I'm confused :-) >> If that's not acceptable, then I >> suppose there is no way to boot from NAND on a board where NAND signals >> go through a discrete mux where the select signal is a GPIO pin. One problem I have is that I still don't really understand if this is a pin mux, i.e. changing the connection to a certain device onto some actual *PIN* or just some other mux muxing some certain line from one silicon block to another. > Linus, tell me if I'm wrong, but I think, the pinctrl-gpio is the right way > to solve > the at91rm9200ek board use case. I don't know, because I don't know exactly what you mean by "pinctrl-gpio". Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
