On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 04:13:22PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote: > On 13/03/2025 10:41, Mikołaj Lenczewski wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c > > index d561cf3b8ac7..b936e0805161 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c > > @@ -2176,6 +2176,76 @@ static bool hvhe_possible(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, > > return arm64_test_sw_feature_override(ARM64_SW_FEATURE_OVERRIDE_HVHE); > > } > > > > +static inline bool bbml2_possible(void) > > +{ > > + return !arm64_test_sw_feature_override(ARM64_SW_FEATURE_OVERRIDE_NOBBML2); > > If you're going to keep this helper, I think it really needs to be: > > return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BBML2_NOABORT) && > !arm64_test_sw_feature_override(ARM64_SW_FEATURE_OVERRIDE_NOBBML2); > > Then you would simplify the caller to remove it's own > IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BBML2_NOABORT) check. > > But personally I would remove the helper and just fold the test into > has_bbml2_noabort(). > > Thanks, > Ryan I was debating folding it into has_bbml2_noabort(), but went ahead and implemented it separately to match hvhe_possible(), which was another sw feature helper. But I agree, folding it will be simpler and read just as easily (if not easier). Will do so. > > +} > > + > > +static bool cpu_has_bbml2_noabort(unsigned int cpu_midr) > > +{ > > + /* We want to allow usage of bbml2 in as wide a range of kernel contexts > > + * as possible. This list is therefore an allow-list of known-good > > + * implementations that both support bbml2 and additionally, fulfill the > > + * extra constraint of never generating TLB conflict aborts when using > > + * the relaxed bbml2 semantics (such aborts make use of bbml2 in certain > > + * kernel contexts difficult to prove safe against recursive aborts). > > + * > > + * Note that implementations can only be considered "known-good" if their > > + * implementors attest to the fact that the implementation never raises > > + * TLBI conflict aborts for bbml2 mapping granularity changes. > > + */ > > + static const struct midr_range supports_bbml2_noabort_list[] = { > > + MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_X4, 0, 3, 0xf), > > + MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_NEOVERSE_V3, 0, 2, 0xf), > > + {} > > + }; > > + > > + return is_midr_in_range_list(cpu_midr, supports_bbml2_noabort_list); > > +} > > + > > +static inline unsigned int __cpu_read_midr(int cpu) > > nit: why the double underscrore prefix? Again copying other helpers I saw that seemed to do similar things. Didn't know if this was the expected style, so did as other helpers did. Will remove. Thank you for the review. -- Kind regards, Mikołaj Lenczewski