On Tue 2025-03-11 10:21:23, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > %pC and %pCn print the same string, and commit 900cca294425 ("lib/vsprintf: > add %pC{,n,r} format specifiers for clocks") introducing them does not > clarify any intended difference. It can be assumed %pC is a default for > %pCn as some other specifiers do, but not all are consistent with this > policy. Moreover there is now no other suffix other than 'n', which makes a > default not really useful. > > All users in the kernel were using %pC except for one which has been > converted. So now remove %pCn and all the unnecessary extra code and > documentation. > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@xxxxxxxxxxx> Makes sense. Looks and works well, so: Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> Daniel, if I get it correctly, you have already taken the 1st patch. Would you mind to take also this patch using the same tree, please? Otherwise, we would need to coordinate pull requests in the upcoming merge window ;-) Best Regards, Petr