On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 02:41:29AM +0800, kth wrote: > The documentation incorrectly referred to 'smbfs' as 'smpfs'. This change corrects that typo to ensure the documentation is accurate and not misleading. > > Signed-off-by: Kang Taeho <kangtaeho2456@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/highuid.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/highuid.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/highuid.rst > index 6ee70465c0ea..9239067563a1 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/highuid.rst > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/highuid.rst > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ What's left to be done for 32-bit UIDs on all Linux architectures: > > Other filesystems have not been checked yet. > > -- The ncpfs and smpfs filesystems cannot presently use 32-bit UIDs in > +- The ncpfs and smbfs filesystems cannot presently use 32-bit UIDs in ncpfs doesn't exist any more; it was removed many years ago. And the smbfs that is referred to here was replaced by cifs many years ago. I have a feeling the entire highuid document should be deleted. It describes a transition that happened 25 years ago.
