Em Fri, 7 Mar 2025 13:04:51 +0530 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > This fixes various kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h: > > - WARNING: Inline literal start-string without end-string. > - ERROR: Unexpected indentation. > - ERROR: Unknown target name: "gfp". > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/cpumask.h | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h > index 36a890d0dd57..8b53e01dbd97 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h > +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ > * cpumask_pr_args - printf args to output a cpumask > * @maskp: cpumask to be printed > * > - * Can be used to provide arguments for '%*pb[l]' when printing a cpumask. > + * Can be used to provide arguments for '%*pb [l]' when printing a cpumask. The best here would be to use, instead: * Can be used to provide arguments for ``*pb[l]`` when printing a cpumask. Which would be converted to this ReST notation: Can be used to provide arguments for ``*pb[l]`` when printing a cpumask. which is what it would be expected when converted to html/pdf. > */ > #define cpumask_pr_args(maskp) nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_bits(maskp) > > @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *src > } > > /** > - * cpumask_first_and - return the first cpu from *srcp1 & *srcp2 > + * cpumask_first_and - return the first cpu from *@srcp1 & *@srcp2 I don't think this would produce the right output. See my other comment. See, if I add this there: * cpumask_first_and - return the first cpu from ``*srcp1`` & @srcp2 & *@srp3 The kernel-doc output is: .. c:function:: unsigned int cpumask_first_and (const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumask *srcp2) return the first cpu from ``*srcp1`` & **srcp2** & ***srp3** e.g.: - srcp1: will not be bold, but it will use a monospaced font and will have an asterisk; - srcp2: will be bold, without asterisk; - srcp3: violates ReST spec: different versions may show it different and warnings may be issued. Thanks, Mauro