On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 9:07 PM Navid Mafi <navidmafi2006@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Clarify that S2Idle corresponds to ACPI S0ix, not the ACPI S2 state, to > avoid confusion. > > Link: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_Spec_6_5_Aug29.pdf#chapter.16 > Signed-off-by: Navid Mafi <navidmafi2006@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/sleep-states.rst | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/sleep-states.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/sleep-states.rst > index ee55a460c..8aeb33268 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/sleep-states.rst > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/sleep-states.rst > @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ This state can be used on platforms without support for :ref:`standby <standby>` > or :ref:`suspend-to-RAM <s2ram>`, or it can be used in addition to any of the > deeper system suspend variants to provide reduced resume latency. It is always > supported if the :c:macro:`CONFIG_SUSPEND` kernel configuration option is set. > +Despite the similar name, this is not equivalent to ACPI S2; it corresponds to > +the ACPI S0ix state instead. > > .. _standby: > > -- > 2.48.1 > Many thanks to corbet@xxxxxxx for the guidance—it helped me get this patch in shape.
